 |
Guilderland budget vote passes: 2011,
yes; 1136, no
Voters went to the polls on Tuesday, May
15 and passed the Guilderland
Central School District 2007-08 school budget by a margin of
2011, yes to 1136, no. Residents also passed:
-
The bus and equipment proposition
(2011, yes; 1093, no)
-
The land purchase proposition (1801,
yes; 1172, no)
-
The proposition to establish a
Capital Reserve Fund (2082, yes; 1076, no)
In addition, voters also elected Barbara
Fraterrigo, Colleen O'Connell, and Gloria Towle-Hilt to the
Guilderland Board of Education. Board candidate vote totals
were as follows:
-
Gloria Towle-Hilt, 2046
-
Colleen O'Connell, 1987
-
Barbara Fraterrigo, 1717
-
Carolyn Kelly, 1606
-
John Fraher, 1550
The public vote on
the Guilderland Central School District 2007-08 budget is set for
Tuesday, May 15 from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. at all elementary schools.
At its meeting on April 3, the
Guilderland Central School District Board of Education
unanimously adopted an $81.9 million spending plan for the
2007-08 school year. This budget represents a 3.76 percent
increase in spending over the current year’s budget. If
approved by voters on May 15, it would result in an
estimated 2.48 percent tax rate increase for residents in
the Town of Guilderland.
Since first introduced to the Citizens’
Budget Advisory Committee on March 1, next year’s spending
plan has undergone several revisions—based primarily on
feedback from the Committee and from the Board of Education. Reductions have been made in the areas
of instructional salaries, health insurance premiums,
transportation, and special education (BOCES) costs totaling
nearly $420,000 and additional resources have been allocated
to upgrade the district’s computer hardware. In addition, with the passage of an
on-time state budget, the district now knows it is slated to
receive an additional $400,000 in state aid beyond what was
originally projected. As a result, the district was able to
lower next year’s tax levy—the total amount of money needed
to be collected from district residents—by nearly $763,000
and reduce the proposed tax rate increase to 2.48 percent
(versus the 3.81 percent increase initially presented to the
CBAC). |